An argument in favor of believing in creation science

Natural selection might explain microevolution, but it cannot explain the origin of new species and higher orders of life. Proponents of intelligent-design theory frequently decline to be pinned down on these points.

But its grouping of organisms is anything but arbitrary, even though there is an element of subjectivity to it. Predestination in Islam Ahmadiyya The Ahmadiyya movement actively promotes evolutionary theory. As such, they assumed that the Sun, Moon, stars, and naked eye planets circled Earth, including the noteworthy systems of Aristotle see Aristotelian physics and Ptolemy.

With this independence, the old-earth evidence is not like a "house of cards" where if one part falls it all falls.

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

Furthermore, recognizing a new species during a formative stage can be difficult because biologists sometimes disagree about how best to define a species.

They give false impressions of an old Earth, when in fact it is no older than 10, years, which is proven by Dr. There are valid reasons, based on careful linguistic and theological reasoning, for adopting old-earth interpretations of Genesis.

A hybrid theory of "AA plus flood geology" can be tested, and many of its predictions do not agree with the scientific evidence.

Belief in God is a better explanation for this morality than any alternative. Thus, science welcomes the possibility of evolution resulting from forces beyond natural selection. National Academy Press, Yet those forces must be natural; they cannot be attributed to the actions of mysterious creative intelligences whose existence, in scientific terms, is unproved.

To avoid this difficulty and others, many advocates of young-earth science claim that the universe was created with apparent age AA that makes some features appear to be very old even though the actual age is very young.

There are not enough molecules in the universe or time since the beginning to account for these possible ways to come together in even this simple life form, let alone human beings. Homologous structures, on the other hand, make no sense from a special creation paradigm.

Drop a fast-breeding pair of small-beaked finches and a slower-breeding pair of large-beaked finches onto an island full of food seeds. But legislation cannot make a belief system scientific; only scientists can do that. Yet evolutionary biologists have answers to these objections.

Exactly how it happened, and what the relative strengths of the various causal mechanisms are, continues to be discussed. Living fossils organisms that have not changed for millions of years simply means that they evolved an adequate structure for a relatively static and unchanging environment, good enough to maintain a niche.

25 Creationist' Arguments 25 Evolutionist' Answers

As for the theory itself, it can be used to support Marxist, communist, and atheist ideologies, and it has; but so has it been used especially in Americato lend scientific credence to laissez-faire capitalism.

Produced as a companion to the seven-part television series Evolution, this site is an enjoyable guide to evolutionary science. National Center for Science Education Web site www. Today's intelligent-design advocates are more sophisticated than their predecessors, but their arguments and goals are not fundamentally different.

Gap theorists can therefore agree with the scientific consensus regarding the age of the Earth and universe, while maintaining a literal interpretation of the biblical text. Thus, the argument is better treated as a disproof of naturalistic materialism.

Argument 3: “Overwhelming Evidence in All Fields of Science Supports Evolution.” The irony, of course, is that for centuries prior to Darwin’s publication of On the Origin of Species, the majority of scientists found the opposite to be true: the “evidence” supported creation.

Rational Arguments in favor of

This, of course, undermines the entire superstructure of "creation-science" and argument #1, but is untrue anyway because science does deal with past phenomena, as found in the historical sciences of cosmology, geology, paleontology, paleoanthropology, and archaeology.

Sep 10,  · But there is a growing body of evidence that supports a recent creation and a worldwide flood. The radio halos in Precambrian granite still remain irrefutable.


A new study has been recently published by the Institute for Creation Research on radiometric dating, called the RATE Resolved. Project Steve is a spoof of the lists of people that evolution deniers use to try to argue that evolution is a "theory in crisis" conducted by the National Center for Science Science Education.

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

It uses humor to eviscerate claims that scientists are abandoning evolutionary biology. YouTube Screenshot Ken Ham, founding president and CEO of Answers in Genesis, went head-to-head with Bill Nye, known popularly as "The Science Guy" for his scientific kids show, at The Creation Museum Tuesday night.

Nye listed argument after argument attacking the six-day creation. Arguments of Creationism We Should Not Use. Darwinists promote the myth that the U.S. Supreme Court has banned the teaching of creation.

Yet the National Center for Science Education, the leading advocate of teaching evolution in government schools, admits that the courts have established only five basic standards. There will be.

5 Arguments For and Against the Existence of God An argument in favor of believing in creation science
Rated 0/5 based on 55 review
Rational Arguments in favor of "Creation Science"? | Yahoo Answers